Quick Summary
Every major dealership service scheduler loads the booking flow from a domain the dealer does not own. We checked 24 of our own client rooftops in August 2026: all 15 identifiable schedulers ran inside a vendor iframe (Xtime, CDK, Reynolds, Dealer-FX, myKaarma) or an OEM-hosted tool.
That means your schedule-service page does the ranking and the vendor widget does the booking, so the SEO work lives in the page around the widget, not in the widget itself.
What You Should Know
For GMs
- Fixed ops averages $9.7 million per rooftop in service and parts sales per NADA 2025, and the booking path for that revenue runs through one page on your website plus one vendor widget.
- Your OEM or DMS has probably already chosen your scheduler. The decision you still own is whether anyone is building the content that gets service customers to the booking page.
- If your service director cannot say how many appointments came from organic search last month, the analytics broke at the scheduler's domain boundary. That is a one-time fix, not a subscription.
For Service Directors
- After-hours demand is real: 14% of appointments at CDK AIVA stores book outside business hours. If nothing answers your phone at 7pm, that booking goes to a chain that does.
- The scheduler's own source report is the only place phone and AI bookings appear. Pull it monthly next to GA4 or you are managing the drive on half the picture.
- Customers assume you cost more than the general repair shop, and Cox's data says the average spend gap runs the other way: $261 at dealers versus $275 at general repair. Publish your pricing.
For Marketing Directors
- Test the schedule-service URL in PageSpeed Insights, not the homepage. The vendor iframe usually drags that page 20 to 30 points below the rest of the site.
- Add the scheduler's domain to your GA4 cross-domain configuration and referral exclusions on day one, or organic bookings will report as vendor referral traffic forever.
- The scheduler wrapper page is the highest-intent URL on the site that nobody owns. Claim it: real content above the widget, FAQ blocks below it, Service schema on it.
“We audited two dozen of our own rooftops and every single scheduler booked on somebody else's domain. Xtime, CDK, Reynolds, all of them. The dealers winning service search are not the ones with a better widget. They are the ones with real pages around the widget.”
Ryan Boyle
Director, A3 Brands
In August 2026 we pulled the schedule-service page on 24 of our client rooftops. On the 15 where we could identify the booking tool, all 15 loaded it from a domain the dealer does not own.
Xtime iframes on the BMW and Mercedes stores, CDK widgets on the Ford and Hyundai stores, Reynolds Service Portal on the Toyota stores, Dealer-FX on the Stellantis store, myKaarma on a Manhattan luxury store, and GM and Ford OEM schedulers on the rest.
That single fact changes how you should evaluate this software. The vendor demos compare booking features. Nobody compares what the scheduler does to your fixed ops SEO, and fixed ops is the fight you are losing: dealerships now capture just 29% of service visits, down 12% since 2018, while general repair chains take 27%.
This guide covers the 10 scheduling platforms franchise dealerships actually use in 2026: what each does well, where each falls short, and what each means for whether your service department gets found. The scheduler books the appointment. It has never once ranked the page.
Why your service scheduler matters for SEO
Fixed ops is the profit engine of the store. NADA counted $164.6 billion in service and parts sales across franchised dealerships in 2025, from 276 million repair orders, averaging $9.7 million per rooftop.
And the fight for those repair orders now starts in a search box, where dealers are losing: the 2025 Cox Automotive Service Industry Study puts the dealership share of service visits at 29%, and among vehicles under two years old the dealer share fell from 68% to 55%.
Your scheduling platform sits at the exact point where a search becomes a booked RO. Here is the structural problem almost no one evaluates. In every implementation we audited, the scheduler loads inside an iframe or a redirect pointing at the vendor's domain: consumer.xtime.com, connectcdk.com, reyrey.net, dealer-fx.com, mykaarma.com.
That architecture has three consequences. Google cannot read the content inside the iframe as part of your page, so your service menus, pricing, and availability contribute nothing to your rankings. The widget adds third-party JavaScript weight to a page that needs to pass Core Web Vitals.
And your analytics break at the domain boundary unless someone configures cross-domain measurement, which is why so many service directors cannot answer the question "how many appointments came from organic search last month?"
The page ranks. The iframe books. Evaluate the platform on how well it lets both happen.
The Service Fight in Numbers
29%
Dealer Share of Service Visits
Down 12% since 2018 while general repair chains grew to 27% (Cox Automotive, 2025)
$164.6B
Service and Parts Sales
Across franchised dealerships in 2025, from 276 million repair orders (NADA)
15/15
Schedulers Booking Off-Domain
Every identifiable scheduler in our 24-rooftop client audit loaded from a vendor domain
What to evaluate in a service scheduling platform
Every vendor will tell you their scheduler is fast and mobile-friendly. Here is the four-dimension test we actually run.
Where the booking lives.
Embedded iframe on your page, hosted vendor page, or full redirect. An iframe on your own /schedule-service/ URL is the best of the realistic options, because the ranking page stays on your domain. A redirect to the vendor's domain hands the entire visit away. Test it: open your own scheduler and watch the address bar.
Page-speed cost.
The widget is third-party JavaScript on one of your highest-intent pages. Run PageSpeed Insights on the schedule-service URL, not the homepage. We routinely see the scheduler page score 20 to 30 points below the service landing page that feeds it.
Attribution survival.
The booking confirmation fires inside the vendor's domain. Without cross-domain GA4 configuration and the vendor domain in your referral exclusion list, organic bookings show up as referral traffic from the scheduler, and your best channel gets credited to a vendor.
Ask the vendor for their GA4 cross-domain documentation before you sign.
Content around the widget.
Can you publish service landing pages, FAQ blocks, pricing content, and Service schema on the pages that link into the scheduler?
The widget will never rank. The pages that wrap and feed it are where the rankings come from, and that capability belongs to your website platform, which is why we evaluate schedulers and website platforms as a pair.
Scheduler Evaluation Checklist
Where the Booking Lives
Embedded iframe on your URL, hosted vendor page, or full redirect. Watch the address bar.
Page-Speed Cost
Run PageSpeed Insights on the schedule-service URL. Expect the widget to cost 20-30 points.
Attribution Survival
GA4 cross-domain config plus referral exclusions, or organic bookings credit to the vendor.
Content Around the Widget
Service pages, pricing, FAQ blocks, and Service schema on the pages that feed the scheduler.
Xtime (Cox Automotive)
Xtime is the volume leader in franchise service scheduling and the default answer for most Cox-ecosystem stores.
What it does.
Consumer scheduling with capacity management, service menus with pricing, recall integration, plus the wider Spectrum suite: inspections with photo and video, texting, and payments. Cox reports nearly 7,000 franchise dealers on the platform across more than 20 OEM programs.
Strengths:
- ●Deepest OEM program coverage of any scheduler, so factory recall data and maintenance menus flow in automatically
- ●Capacity management is genuinely strong: advisor availability, shop loading, and transportation options all constrain the calendar
- ●Tight integration with Dealertrack DMS, VinSolutions, and Dealer.com
- ●Cox self-reports dealers averaging 152 additional ROs per month
SEO watch-outs:
- ●The consumer flow loads from consumer.xtime.com in an iframe or popup. On two of our stores it ships with WMODE and skipRedirect parameters that keep the visitor technically on your page while every meaningful interaction happens on Cox's domain
- ●The iframe adds meaningful JavaScript weight to the scheduling page
- ●Booking confirmations need cross-domain GA4 setup or your organic attribution dies at the iframe boundary
Best for:
Cox-ecosystem stores and multi-OEM groups that want one scheduler with factory data everywhere. Just treat the wrapper page as yours to optimize, because Cox will not do it for you.
7,000
Franchise Dealers on Xtime
Cox Automotive reports nearly 7,000 franchise dealers and more than 20 OEM partners on Xtime, the largest service-scheduling footprint in the industry.
CDK service and AIVA
CDK bundles scheduling into its Fixed Operations Suite, and since July 2025 it sells that suite to stores that do not run the CDK DMS.
What it does.
Online booking around real-time technician availability and shop loading, service lane check-in, inspections, and AIVA, an AI virtual assistant that books appointments by phone, chat, and text in more than 50 languages. The scheduler is certified by Honda, so bookings sync across HondaLink, AcuraLink, and the dealer website.
Strengths:
- ●DMS-native data when you run CDK: customer history, recalls, service contracts, and vehicle alerts personalize the booking flow
- ●AIVA's pilot numbers are real signal: 23% of appointments at pilot dealerships were booked by the AI, and 14% of appointments now land after business hours
- ●One vendor for scheduler, service lane, and DMS removes integration finger-pointing
SEO watch-outs:
- ●The consumer widget loads from connectcdk.com. On our Ford and Hyundai rooftops the booking flow is an api.connectcdk.com iframe on the dealer's appointment page
- ●CDK pages tend to carry heavy script payloads; test the appointment URL in PageSpeed Insights before and after install
- ●After-hours AI bookings by phone never touch your website, which is good for coverage and invisible to your web analytics, so track them in the scheduler's own reporting
Best for:
CDK DMS stores, and Honda and Acura dealers who want factory-certified sync. Strong pick if phone abandonment is your biggest leak.
Dealer-FX (Snap-on)
Dealer-FX, a Snap-on company, is the scheduler many dealers run without ever having chosen it, because it arrives through the OEM service program.
What it does.
ONE Platform covers online scheduling, mobile check-in, digital multipoint inspection with video, service status tracking, and payments.
Dealer-FX has served as the exclusive or preferred service technology provider for OEM programs including Stellantis, Nissan, Mitsubishi, Kia, and Hyundai, and it powers Toyota SmartPath service experiences. It integrates with more than 20 DMS providers.
Strengths:
- ●VIN-specific maintenance menus built on Snap-on repair data, which is a genuine differentiator for accuracy
- ●OEM program pricing often makes it heavily subsidized or effectively mandatory, so the business case is simple
- ●Bi-directional DMS data flow is mature after nearly two decades of integrations
SEO watch-outs:
- ●Booking happens on scheduleanywhere and scheduler subdomains of dealer-fx.com. Our Stellantis store's appointment page is a wrapper around a scheduleanywhere1.dealer-fx.com iframe
- ●OEM-templated wrapper pages tend to be thin: a heading, an iframe, and nothing for Google to rank
- ●When the OEM mandates the tool, dealers assume the page is also handled. It is not. The wrapper page is yours
Best for:
Stores in Dealer-FX OEM programs, which is most Stellantis and many Nissan, Kia, and Hyundai rooftops. You keep the mandated widget and build real content around it.
Reynolds service portal
Reynolds and Reynolds takes the same position in service scheduling that it takes everywhere: deeply integrated, closed, and dependable.
What it does.
Service Portal is the online scheduler that rides on ERA-IGNITE, with appointment data landing directly in the DMS customer file. In 2026 Reynolds added Appointment AI for phone scheduling, developed with STELLA Automotive AI, plus GoMoto self-service check-in kiosks in the lane.
Strengths:
- ●Appointments write straight into ERA-IGNITE customer histories, no middleware, no sync failures
- ●The 2026 AI additions close the after-hours phone gap that ERA stores historically leaked
- ●Reynolds service tooling is mature; the company has been building fixed ops software for decades
SEO watch-outs:
- ●The scheduler loads from reyrey.net in a tokenized iframe. On our Toyota and Hyundai rooftops the appointment page embeds r-number.m.reyrey.net/service-portal with a session token in the URL
- ●Those tokenized URLs are completely opaque to search engines and to most analytics setups; the domain hop from your site to reyrey.net needs explicit GA4 cross-domain configuration
- ●Reynolds' closed ecosystem means the wrapper page is often whatever the website provider shipped on day one, and nobody revisits it
Best for:
ERA-IGNITE stores, where fighting the default costs more than it returns. Take the integration win, then invest in the service pages that feed the portal.
Tekion
Tekion is the only platform on this list where scheduling is not an integration, because the scheduler and the DMS are the same product.
What it does.
Service scheduling built into Automotive Retail Cloud: three-step consumer booking, appointment suggestions based on service type and available resources, machine-learning service recommendations, mobile check-in, and automatic RO creation. One data layer covers scheduling, parts, technician dispatch, and billing.
Strengths:
- ●No sync step means no sync failures: the appointment, the customer record, and the RO live in one system
- ●Modern, fast consumer flow that embarrasses most legacy schedulers on mobile
- ●Real operational results at reference stores: one dealer group reported 30% more RO capacity per day after moving service operations onto the platform
SEO watch-outs:
- ●Consumer booking runs through Tekion's portal rather than natively on your domain, so the same wrapper-page rules apply
- ●Tekion's momentum is in DMS conversions, which is a whole-store decision; nobody should switch DMS to improve a scheduling page
- ●Younger integration ecosystem than CDK or Reynolds for the third-party tools already in your stack
Best for:
Stores already on Tekion or actively converting to it. If you are mid-conversion, this is the moment to demand clean scheduling URLs, cross-domain analytics, and a content-capable service section, because you are rebuilding everything anyway.
myKaarma
myKaarma built its reputation on service lane communication and payments, then moved upstream into scheduling.
What it does.
Scheduler+ handles online booking with capacity controls by advisor, team, and time slot. Around it sit the pieces myKaarma is known for: unified texting and calling, payments, ServiceCart video MPI, pickup and delivery dispatch, and ServiceConcierge, the AI phone assistant it launched in early 2026. The company reports more than 2,000 dealerships on the platform.
Strengths:
- ●The embeddable consumer scheduler is built to sit inside any major website provider and can be styled to match your brand, which keeps the booking experience visually on-domain
- ●Maintenance menus promoted by make, model, and mileage at booking time lift RO value before the car arrives
- ●Communication-to-payment thread in one system is still the best in the lane
SEO watch-outs:
- ●Embedded still means iframe: our Manhattan luxury store's appointment page wraps app.mykaarma.com/web-scheduler-app with a dealer UUID. Styled or not, the booking content belongs to mykaarma.com
- ●Pricing runs premium with annual contracts, so smaller stores should confirm the scheduling module earns its keep beyond the communication suite they actually came for
Best for:
Luxury and CSI-obsessed stores that want booking, communication, and payment in one thread. Our Mercedes-Benz client in Manhattan runs exactly this stack.
Affinitiv Book
Affinitiv Book is the scheduler with the longest bloodline in the industry: it descends from TimeHighway, which was booking dealership service online before most dealers had a mobile site, and merged into Affinitiv in 2016.
What it does.
Online scheduling inside Affinitiv's Service Lane Experience Suite, next to SmartLane write-up, electronic MPI, Tech Video, and messaging, with Affinitiv's retention marketing engine driving traffic into the calendar. Affinitiv works with more than 20 OEM brands and supports thousands of rooftops through its marketing programs.
Strengths:
- ●The marketing-to-booking loop is the point: service reminders, declined-service follow-up, and lifecycle campaigns all link directly into the scheduler
- ●Real-time DMS-integrated availability with appointments written back to customer histories
- ●Often bundled into OEM marketing programs a store already pays for
SEO watch-outs:
- ●Booking happens on Affinitiv-hosted pages, and the email-driven model means many bookings never touch your website at all, which is fine for retention and invisible to your organic funnel
- ●Campaign links pointing at vendor-hosted scheduling pages leak traffic that could land on your own service pages first; ask for campaign destinations on your domain wherever possible
Best for:
Stores that buy Affinitiv for retention marketing anyway. The scheduler is the natural landing point for those campaigns; just keep organic search pointed at your own pages, not the campaign URLs.
DealerLogix
DealerLogix is the smaller, service-lane-first vendor on this list, and the one Lexus picked as a partner in its Service Scheduler Program.
What it does.
Cloud-based service lane suite: appointment scheduling with online booking, pickup and loaner requests inside the booking flow, digital RO write-up, multipoint inspection, and reporting. It integrates with the major DMS platforms, OEM scheduling systems, and third-party AI booking tools rather than trying to own every layer itself.
Strengths:
- ●Lexus partnership is meaningful validation for a vendor this size, and it plays well in OEM-mandated environments
- ●Customers can describe issues and request transportation during booking, which cuts advisor write-up time at the lane
- ●The open posture toward OEM schedulers and AI layers makes it a good citizen in a mixed stack
SEO watch-outs:
- ●Same hosted-widget architecture as the rest of the list, with the booking flow on DealerLogix infrastructure
- ●Smaller vendor means the analytics and tracking documentation is thinner; plan on your own team or your SEO partner configuring the cross-domain measurement
Best for:
Lexus stores in the scheduler program, and single-point stores that want a modern lane suite without enterprise pricing. Pair it with deliberate service page content, because nothing about the default install will generate any.
UpdatePromise
UpdatePromise comes out of the collision and service communication world and sells scheduling as part of a consumer experience suite.
What it does.
An appointment system with a self-service online widget for the dealer website, DMS-integrated appointment management for staff, plus status updates, texting, and payment tools. The pitch is one consumer experience layer across service and collision.
Strengths:
- ●The staff-side booking screen mirrors the consumer widget, so phone bookings and web bookings land in one calendar with one rule set
- ●Collision-plus-service coverage is unusual and useful for dealer groups running body shops, which NADA says 38% of dealerships operate
- ●Lighter footprint and simpler contracts than the enterprise schedulers
SEO watch-outs:
- ●The widget is a hosted embed like everything else here, with the same iframe, speed, and attribution homework
- ●Smaller market share means fewer prebuilt integrations with the AI booking layers and website providers, so verify your specific stack before signing
Best for:
Groups with combined mechanical and collision operations that want one scheduling and communication vendor across both. For a franchise store with no body shop, the bigger platforms above will usually fit the OEM stack better.
The AI booking layer: STELLA, Numa, AIVA
The newest layer in the scheduling stack does not replace your scheduler. It answers the phone in front of it.
What it is.
AI voice agents that pick up service calls around the clock, look up the customer, and book directly into your existing scheduler.
STELLA Automotive AI holds certified integrations with Tekion, CDK, and Reynolds, partnered with Reynolds on its 2026 Appointment AI, and is an approved FordDirect vendor. Numa focuses on rescuing missed calls. CDK's AIVA does the same job inside the CDK stack.
Why it matters.
Service BDCs miss calls every single day, and every missed call is a booked oil change at the quick lube down the street.
One dealer group running STELLA reports 56% of booking opportunities converting to confirmed appointments, with top stores at 70%. CDK's pilot data showing 14% of appointments booked after hours tells you exactly how much demand your closed BDC was sending elsewhere.
We found STELLA tags on seven of the 24 rooftops we audited, so adoption among our own clients is already real.
SEO watch-outs:
- ●Phone bookings bypass your website entirely, so as this layer grows, your web analytics understate total scheduling demand; pull the scheduler's own source report monthly
- ●The AI answers the phone number Google shows, which makes your Google Business Profile accuracy and call tracking configuration part of the scheduling stack now
Best for:
Any store leaking phone calls, which in our experience is most of them. This is an add-on decision, not a scheduler replacement.
23%
Of Appointments Booked by AI
At CDK pilot dealerships, the AIVA virtual assistant booked nearly a quarter of all service appointments, and 14% of bookings now land after business hours.
Platform comparison: How they stack up
No scheduler wins every dimension, and for many stores the OEM or DMS has already made the choice.
Xtime wins on OEM breadth and booking volume. CDK wins inside its own DMS ecosystem and leads on AI phone booking with AIVA. Dealer-FX wins wherever the OEM program mandates it, which is much of the Stellantis, Nissan, Kia, and Hyundai world. Reynolds Service Portal is the path of least resistance for ERA-IGNITE stores. Tekion wins on architecture for stores already converting their DMS.
myKaarma wins the luxury lane on communication and brandable embeds. Affinitiv Book wins when retention marketing drives the calendar. DealerLogix and UpdatePromise serve stores that want capable tools without enterprise contracts. STELLA and Numa sit on top of any of them and catch the phone demand the others miss.
Two patterns from our own 24-rooftop audit are worth repeating. First, brand predicts scheduler: our Toyota stores run Reynolds or SmartPath flows, the Stellantis store runs Dealer-FX, the GM store runs GM's own oss.gm.com tool, and the Ford stores run CDK or Ford's GuestXP.
Second, every single implementation books off-domain. There is no scheduler on this list that ranks for you. Which means the comparison table below is really a map of how much wrapper-page work each choice leaves behind.
Dealership Service Scheduler Comparison
| Platform | Booking Lives | Ecosystem Fit | AI Booking | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xtime | Vendor iframe | Cox / Dealertrack | Via partners | Multi-OEM groups, Cox stores |
| CDK Service | Vendor iframe | CDK DMS (now open) | AIVA built in | CDK stores, Honda/Acura |
| Dealer-FX | Vendor iframe | OEM programs | Via partners | Stellantis, Nissan, Kia, Hyundai |
| Reynolds Service Portal | Tokenized iframe | ERA-IGNITE | Appointment AI | Reynolds DMS stores |
| Tekion | Vendor portal | DMS-native | Built in | Tekion converts |
| myKaarma | Branded iframe | CDK, Reynolds | ServiceConcierge | Luxury, CSI-focused stores |
| Affinitiv Book | Hosted pages | Marketing suite | No | Retention-marketing stores |
| DealerLogix | Hosted widget | Open integrations | Via partners | Lexus program, single points |
| UpdatePromise | Hosted embed | Service + collision | No | Groups with body shops |
| STELLA / Numa | Phone, off-web | Sits on any scheduler | Is the AI | Stores leaking phone calls |
Why service SEO must live outside your scheduler
Here is the trap: the scheduler vendor sells you a booking tool, the website provider ships a schedule-service page with an iframe on it, and everyone assumes the job is done.
Then a customer searches "brake service near me" and a quick-lube chain outranks your $9.7 million service operation, exactly the pattern we broke down in why quick-lube chains outrank service departments.
The scheduler cannot fix that, because the scheduler only exists for people who already found you.
What ranks is everything around it: individual service pages for brakes, tires, batteries, and oil changes, recall pages, transparent pricing content, FAQ blocks answering the questions AI search engines now answer for your customers, and Service schema telling Google exactly what your drive does.
The 2025 Cox study found 55% of vehicle owners want to compare prices on a dealership website, and the same study shows customers wrongly assume dealer service costs more when average spend at general repair shops ran $275 against $261 at dealerships. Content closes that gap. A widget never will.
Our position after auditing all of these platforms across our client base: keep whichever scheduler your OEM, DMS, and service director already like. We work alongside every single one, the same way we work alongside every third-party tool in the dealer stack. The scheduler is the cash register. The strategy is what walks customers up to it.
The Widget Is Not the Strategy
A3 Brands works alongside every scheduler on this list. We build the service pages, schema, and analytics configuration around whichever booking tool your OEM and DMS already chose. Across our client rooftops, the scheduler has never been the reason a service department ranked or failed to rank. The pages around it always were.
Key Takeaways
- ✓Every major dealership scheduler loads its booking flow from the vendor's domain, so your schedule-service page does the ranking while the widget does the booking.
- ✓In our August 2026 audit of 24 client rooftops, all 15 identifiable schedulers ran off-domain: Xtime, CDK, Reynolds, Dealer-FX, myKaarma, or an OEM-hosted tool.
- ✓Dealerships capture only 29% of service visits per the 2025 Cox Automotive study, down 12% since 2018, so the pages that win service searches matter more every year.
- ✓Evaluate schedulers on four dimensions: where the booking lives, page-speed cost of the widget, whether attribution survives the domain hop, and whether you can build content around it.
- ✓AI phone agents are the fastest-growing layer: CDK's AIVA booked 23% of appointments at pilot stores and 14% of bookings now happen after hours.
- ✓Your OEM or DMS usually dictates the scheduler, and that is fine, because the SEO outcome is decided by the service pages around the widget, not the widget.
- ✓Cross-domain GA4 configuration is non-negotiable with any scheduler on this list, or organic search bookings get credited to the vendor's domain as referral traffic.
Founder & President, A3 Brands
Tim spent a decade distributing products to 3,000+ dealerships, ran the Internet Sales department at Baker Automotive Group, and served as Acura's Field Program Manager and Digital Strategist at Shift Digital before founding A3 Brands — one of very few SEO agencies built exclusively for car dealerships.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which service scheduling platform is best for SEO?
Does an iframe scheduler hurt my dealership's SEO?
Should I switch schedulers to improve my service SEO?
How do I track service appointments from organic search?
How much does dealership service scheduling software cost?
Do AI phone schedulers replace my online scheduler?
Sources & References
- NADA Data 2025, Annual Financial Profile of America's Franchised New-Car Dealerships — $164.6B service and parts sales, 276.1 million repair orders, $9.7M per-dealership average, 38.3% of dealerships operating body shops
- 2025 Cox Automotive Service Industry Study — 29% dealer share of service visits (down 12% vs 2018), 68% to 55% decline among vehicles under 2 years old, $261 vs $275 average spend, 55% wanting price comparison on dealer websites
- Cox Automotive, Xtime announcements (January 2025) — Nearly 7,000 franchise dealers and more than 20 OEM partners on Xtime (January 2025 announcement)
- CDK Global via CBT News (July 2025) — AIVA booking 23% of appointments at pilot dealerships, 14% booked after hours, 50+ language support
- A3 Brands client rooftop audit (August 2026) — 24 dealer websites probed; all 15 identifiable schedulers loaded booking flows from vendor or OEM domains
- STELLA Automotive AI — 56% booking-opportunity conversion with top performers at 70%; certified integrations with Tekion, CDK, and Reynolds
Is Your Scheduler Booking Blind?
We will audit your schedule-service page: where the booking actually happens, what the widget costs you in page speed, whether organic bookings survive into GA4, and what content the pages around it are missing.